Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike A.'s avatar

Interesting quotes Colin. When was the "...compete for a World Series..." statement made?

Dipoto doesn't control budget, ownership does.

That's the root of the "no name" position players problem.

Stanton/ownership won't spend for 1st tier free agent position players. It's important to "deliver the mail to the right address" c/o John Stanton.

Do you recall the 2024 early season John Stanton interview? Need those quotes!

I'm too lazy to find the link. But Stanton's words need to be seared inside the head of every M's fan & pundit. When asked, 'why such a modest investment in 2024 position players?', Stanton brushed it off. He said the goal was to "...be competitive...beginning to end of 2024...".

At the halfway, Stanton's M's met Stanton's goal, even though the position players, except Cal, suck. Stanton didn't say "WS or bust". He's happy making money with an exciting team that puts butts in seats.

Stanton won't spend for 1st tier free agent position players. That's why Dipoto's position player FA acquisitions are a continual mix of bounce-back hopefuls and lefty/righty platoon guys.

They are "lottery tickets". Some like Suarez, France, Crawford "pay off", at least for a while.

More do not. M's are not and have never been a NYY, Dodger, Texas "all-in" organization.

The M's business model: Pitcher friendly/homer unfriendly park. Guys who hit dingers won't sign because T-Mobile suppresses their calling card. M's spend little on boppers and "professional hitters" like Altuve et al. M's get cheaper good field, speed guys, platoon hitters.

Final Question: What do Griffey Jr. A-Rod, Randy Johnson, Ichiro have in common?

Final Answer that echoes to today: All are superstars and all wanted out of Seattle. to go to organizations that were "all-in", going for all the marbles.

What that tells us is the M's never were and likely never will be an "all-in" organization, dedicated to "winning it all"; at least with current ownership.

Being "in the conversation" is good enough for John Stanton's M's!

Expand full comment

No posts